White House and Harris Silent on Olympics Gender Controversy as Trump Vows to 'Protect Women and Girls'
In the midst of a heated controversy surrounding the inclusion of biologically male, intersex, or transgender athletes in women's sports at the Olympics, both the White House and Kamala Harris' campaign have remained silent. Meanwhile, former President Donald Trump has quickly denounced the participation of such athletes in women’s sports, highlighting the political divide on this issue.
Trump's Stance on Gender Eligibility in Sports
The Trump campaign was quick to respond to the controversy, emphasizing Trump’s commitment to preventing biologically male athletes from competing in women’s sports. A Trump campaign spokesperson told Fox News Digital, "President Trump has been unequivocally clear that he will NOT stand for men competing in women’s sports – an insane and unfair reality that has been allowed to transpire because of Radical Left politicians like Kamala Harris. When he returns to the White House, President Trump will take immediate action to protect women and girls and overturn the Harris-Biden Administration's radical rewrite of Title IX."
The Controversy at the Olympics
The controversy was ignited after Italian boxer Angela Carini withdrew from a match against Algerian Olympian Imane Khelif, just 46 seconds in, citing the impact of a punch. Khelif, who was previously disqualified from the 2023 World Boxing Championships for failing gender tests, was found to have elevated levels of testosterone despite being listed as female on her passport. The International Boxing Association determined that Khelif had XY chromosomes, leading to her exclusion from competition last year.
Khelif was, however, authorized to compete in the Olympics by the International Olympic Committee. The Algerian Olympic Committee (COA) defended Khelif, condemning the criticism as unethical targeting. “COA strongly condemns the unethical targeting and maligning of our esteemed athlete, Imane Khelif, with baseless propaganda from certain foreign media outlets,” the organization stated via Reuters.
International Reactions
Italian officials have expressed concerns over Khelif’s eligibility. Italian Sports Minister Andrea Abodi highlighted the lack of uniform criteria at the international level for such cases. "It is surprising that there are no certain, strict, uniform criteria at the international level," Abodi said, adding it was strange "that there can be a suspicion, and far more than a suspicion, of an unfair and potentially dangerous contest for one of the contenders at the Olympics, an event that symbolizes sporting fairness."
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni also voiced her opinion, stating, “I think that athletes who have male genetic characteristics should not be admitted to women’s competitions. And not because you want to discriminate against someone, but to protect the right of female athletes to be able to compete on equal terms,” Meloni told The Telegraph.
Previous Olympic Controversies
This controversy is not the first since the Olympics began. Organizers faced backlash from various groups worldwide, including Christians, regarding the opening ceremonies of the 2024 games. A skit featuring drag queens and a woman in a halo crown, perceived to mock Leonardo da Vinci’s painting of Jesus' Last Supper, sparked outrage.
Future of Title IX and Gender Identity
If elected, Kamala Harris is expected to continue the Biden administration’s efforts to expand Title IX. This civil rights law, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded schools and educational institutions, now includes protections against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. The expansion of these protections remains a contentious issue, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate.
Conclusion
The silence from the White House and Harris’ campaign on this issue contrasts sharply with Trump’s clear stance, highlighting the deep political divide. As the debate over gender eligibility in sports continues, it remains a pivotal issue in the broader conversation about gender identity and rights in the United States and beyond.
Sources